Archive for April 2008

Journalism in Six Words – A Poynter Contest

April 30, 2008

Shamelessly taken from Miranda Writes, journalism in six words:

  • Doing more with less since 1690
  • We’ll always have Paris … or Britney
  • It’s how I change the world.
  • Get it right, write it tight
  • They’ll miss us when we’re gone
  • Feed the watchdog, euthanize the lapdog
  • Who, what, when, where, why, Web
  • Facts, schmacts … how is my hair?
  • Dirty commie latte-sipping liberal scum
  • Please stop griping, now start typing

I like #1, #3 and #7.


Making an indie film $1 at a time

April 30, 2008

Via Boing Boing, something awesome:


April 29, 2008

I think it’s time I blogged a bit about work. I have always intended this space to be one in which I can write about what matters to me, but I’ve refrained from writing about this new job thus far for fear of the consequences. As you’ll see, this post will maintain some level of anonymity, but I think I’m going to ease the gloves off over time.

(I also think that my overall lack of blogging has been partially due to my decision not to blog about work. Maybe.)

I stopped subbing in December 2007 (with one day’s exception – I was really, really confused when mail from the LCSD showed up today). I started a new job in Corvallis, one that is at least full time. It pays better, but the workload is killer. Down the road, it might even have benefits – though that is a long, ironic story.

I was originally hired to fill a six-month temporary position that was expected to end in June, brought on to compliment an existing employee and help out with a special project. The plan called for at least 3.0 FTE equivalent, with 2.0 in the office at all times and the remaining FTE filled by a pair of folks affiliated with my organization who would conspire to spend 4-5 days in the office between the two of them.

Six weeks in, my coworker, the only person on staff doing the same thing as me, quit. I applied for and got his position, which is full-time and (more or less) permanent. The decision was made not to replace me in the temporary position (how and why that decision was made is still not quite clear to me). As well, one of the people who had originally intended to spend quite a bit of time working in my office got called away to work on another project.

The end result? We’re down to 1.5-1.75 FTE, if that, split among two people instead of four. The workload has shifted somewhat, but not a lot – the original plan had called for two people precisely because previous experience had suggested that one was simply not enough, and I’m not in so deep I missed the irony of my org’s decision (the same org that decided it had needed two people) to stick with one person. I had six weeks experience and no real training when I started the full-time job. We’re in the middle of something rather important (the thing that brought me on in the first place), which means the learning curve is steep and I don’t have a lot of time to adjust.

Oh, and I should mention that two of my bosses, the ones with experience in my field, don’t have much experience working on a project quite like the one I’m working on. So while their experience is good, I’m finding that their suggestions, advice and orders don’t always translate well to my immediate situation – though for the most part, I have had nothing to compare them to. I had the good fortune to host three volunteers from two similar worksites (who do the same work I do! yay!) for two weeks earlier this month, and I learned more from them (thanks, A, D & L) in the two weeks they were here than I did in the preceding 3+ months from my more immediate supervisors. It was amazing (the amount of work we got done and the fun I had was incredible), but the crash that occurred when they left was harsh.

I also inherited the work my predecessors had done in shaping my organization and its relation to the community. I like my predecessor(s), but they did things very differently than how I intend to do things. The problem is that I don’t have the time to really lay the groundwork for the adjustments I want to make – I need to make things happen right fracking now, and it’s proving quite difficult to work in someone else’s paradigm.

On the plus side, I have the support of my seven bosses (yes, I have seven bosses – at three different levels/in three different orgs, depending on how you want to look at things; five of them are a committee). That helps. What doesn’t help is that they are legitimately busier than me and thus rely on me to do quite a few things I would prefer to see them do in the long run (part of my job entails training my bosses to do the things I can do now – and it makes total sense in context, trust me). As a result of my covering for them, my own work has suffered a bit. I’m treading water rather than making progress, or so it feels sometimes.

I have one part-time coworker who is either helping me maintain my sanity or helping me become cynical about my job. I’m not sure which. I think it’s both. In any case, she makes me laugh, which I’m counting as a good thing at this point. At the least she is a source of institutional memory for me, since my predecessor/former coworker chose to keep a lot of really useful information in his head and not in writing.

The next 6-8 weeks look to prove crucial to the project I’m working on. I’m not sure how things will turn out, as I’m finding my ability to influence what happens is much smaller than I’d hoped it would be at this point. As well, I’m seeing decisions made that I think are flat-out wrong, and my inexperience gives me little credibility with which to make my suggestions of alternative courses of action stick.

I suppose I should comment on the upside of all this, in case everyone thinks I think my job sucks. It doesn’t. It’s hard, and I’m in a pretty tough place, but I have lots of optimism regarding the long-term possibilities of my organization. I’ve compiled a long list of projects to start and processes to implement, and I’m genuinely hopeful that when I walk away, I will have really changed and improved the organization.

It’s just the next two months that are threatening to do me in. Right now, I’m focused on survival. After that, well…. *rubs hands together in glee*

By the way, the genesis of this post was two phone conversations Friday and a long lunch I had today with someone who’s becoming a very dear friend. She helped me get some perspective on the seemingly endless list of things I need to do, and reminded me that I need to do a better job taking care of myself while at work. Thanks, J – you have no idea how much that helped – or maybe you do =) I just hope I can make it happen.

Dave, Jen – I think we are going to do a lot of drinking. Get ready.

The mind, it is boggled.

April 29, 2008

From Carrie Brownstein’s Monitor Mix, an excerpt from an interview Brownstein did with a producer from The Bachelor (yes, I know):

Q: What tricks or strategies does the show employ to amp up the drama and tension during the taping of the show?

A: Well, in the private one on one interviews with a producer (like me) it is the producers job to get the sh*t talking started, like “tell me honestly what you think of Sally” — if the interviewee does not want to respond in a catty way then the producer will usually go to the next level, like “well I personally think she is a self absorbed, attention starved skank,” and then see if the person will take the bait. Once you start learning who in the house is not well liked it is easy to start seeding conversations and gossip. Also, if the conversations linger too long on favorite movies and stuff the producers will step in a say, “ok we all know we signed up for a TV show — so if you don’t start talking about something more topical then you can’t have the sushi you requested tonight.” The smarter cast members start to realize that everything can be bartered. Like, “I will give you a good one-on-one interview about Sally, IF you let me listen to my iPod for the rest of the day.”

It’s like the opposite of ethical.

If maintaining people’s dignity is at all important… ah, never mind.


April 23, 2008

Why don’t journalists everywhere publicly repudiate Fox News?

Inspired by this.

The requisite "I have no time for blogging" post

April 22, 2008

Though I do have lots of posts in draft or in the back of my mind.

And yes, many of them involve Hasso Hering.

I’ve had one real day off work since April 6th.

I am not, however, giving up on the blog.

I am le tired.

I think Atrios is religious…

April 22, 2008

…or is that atheist? Either way, he’s got a point: The holier-than-thou game is counterproductive:

One of the more frustrating, futile, and self-aggrandizing rhetorical games is to tell people what their priorities should be. Nick Kristof has played this game in the past, chastising womens’ rights groups for not focusing their limited resources on whatever his pet cause of the week happens to be. It’s also global warming concern troll Bjorn Lomborg’s trick, saying that instead of focusing resources on combating global warming we should use them for a bunch of other things that aren’t going to happen. There’s always a more important cause, a more deserving subject, a more downtrodden person. It’s essentially a way of undermining all good works while building up the critic as More Serious And Enlightened Than Thou.

But people have different priorities. And to the extent people become involved in issues or causes, they have different skill sets, different abilities, different sets of knowledge. They have different things they can bring to the table. Telling people they should be fretting about the women of Afghanistan instead of focusing on eating disorders is, to put it bluntly, just stupid. More than that, it achieves absolutely nothing.