Majikthise on a new news model

This is an interesting idea.  Admittedly, it leaves a lot of questions unanswered, and the existing peer review process for scientific grants isn’t as good as they make it sound, but it does a good job responding to the criticms leveled at some of the other ‘how do we fund journalism’ proposals I’ve seen:

So, what’s the solution? I would argue that journalism should look to science for a public funding model that preserves independence and accountability and puts small and large institutions on a more equitable footing. A great deal of federal science funding is allocated through anonymous peer-reviewed grants.

Any journalists or scientists out there want to weigh in?

Explore posts in the same categories: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: